Jade Clarke OCR Advanced Portfolio In Media Studies H540
Wednesday, 15 January 2014
Friday, 10 January 2014
Evaluation Question Three.
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
For part of my target audience research, I used an interview to find out what hobbies and interests my target audience have and what they like to see in an Alternative Rock music video. To do this, I filmed three people aged 14-18, asking them simple questions such as "Do you prefer a narrative in a music video" being both non and generic specific.
From doing this, I have discovered that people who listen to Alternative Rock tend to enjoy more creative hobbies such as lyric writing or playing an instrument as opposed to more academic hobbies such as reading. The most commonly liked band, by the three members of my target audience was said to be Green Day, who create interesting, unique music videos. They also said that they would prefer to see a narrative, creating sense to the video, however seeing performance to show the members of the band and to "give purpose to the video". They said that they preferred that the concept of the video would relate to the song and/or lyrics, so that there is a clear relationship between the concept of the song and video. They also said that they are bored of seeing videos alike Taylor Swift, which are cliché. However, they said that they liked the cliché theme, as long as it went well with the song. They seemed to expect elements of performance as that is what they were used to seeing in videos of their preferred genre.
By doing this interview, I have found that the audience of this genre tent to dislike mainstream music, which we see in the charts. I learnt that a cliché theme would work, as long as it would be creating a different meaning to the song and lyrics. I also found that most Alternative Rock videos that they are used to seeing contain some sort of simple narrative, alongside performance, which keeps them engaged, as well as the pace and meaning of the song.
Throughout the process of creating my final product, I was given continuous feedback which helped me improve my video.

When the class watched my music video, they liked the main idea of the narrative and the use of filters throughout. They also liked the use of the cross between the narrative and performance. However, as I was already aware of what I have to change, they all agreed that I needed to refilm the argument scene between the girl and her dad. They also agreed, as I did too, that some scenes are clear that there is no drummer (as she had to leave filming early).
To solve these issues I refilmed the argument scene, creating more shots such as hand held (also point of view) to show the argument from both perspectives. I also tightened the lip syncing and instruments within the performance, to make it run smoother and to look more convincing, zooming into clips where there was no drummer.. I also added another clip of the girl checking her phone, receiving a text from her dad asking her to come home, to help the viewers understand why he is so angry towards her within the video. Receiving this feedback has helped me see that the narrative was not clear in why the father was angry, which allowed me to make it more obvious, early on within the editing stage. Gaining this feedback also allowed me to improve my piece, by taking their comments on board.
When putting my video on YouTube once it was complete, a member of staff sent feedback, commenting on everyone's work, with her opinion and improvements. The comments that she made were both complimenting and critical, which allowed me to see what I could of done better and how I could of made the narrative seem less repetitive at the beginning of the video.
After gaining feedback from several year 8 groups in our school, my video was seen as a favourite on a number of feedback sheets. I had comments back such as "We liked Stay With Me as it tells story also is dramatic. We thought it was good but there is no improvements." and "Good angles, good effects, really interesting". However I did get comments to improve on such as "Some angles are too close" and "Not really suitable for children", which the video is aimed at a slightly older target audience, rather than 12-13 year olds. I think that the comments made by the year 8's were true in areas to improve on.
By having a large amount of views on YouTube for my video makes me feel like I did well, despite the criticism and improvement comments I was given after the video was put online.
When the class watched my music video, they liked the main idea of the narrative and the use of filters throughout. They also liked the use of the cross between the narrative and performance. However, as I was already aware of what I have to change, they all agreed that I needed to refilm the argument scene between the girl and her dad. They also agreed, as I did too, that some scenes are clear that there is no drummer (as she had to leave filming early).
To solve these issues I refilmed the argument scene, creating more shots such as hand held (also point of view) to show the argument from both perspectives. I also tightened the lip syncing and instruments within the performance, to make it run smoother and to look more convincing, zooming into clips where there was no drummer.. I also added another clip of the girl checking her phone, receiving a text from her dad asking her to come home, to help the viewers understand why he is so angry towards her within the video. Receiving this feedback has helped me see that the narrative was not clear in why the father was angry, which allowed me to make it more obvious, early on within the editing stage. Gaining this feedback also allowed me to improve my piece, by taking their comments on board.
When putting my video on YouTube once it was complete, a member of staff sent feedback, commenting on everyone's work, with her opinion and improvements. The comments that she made were both complimenting and critical, which allowed me to see what I could of done better and how I could of made the narrative seem less repetitive at the beginning of the video.
By having a large amount of views on YouTube for my video makes me feel like I did well, despite the criticism and improvement comments I was given after the video was put online.
Thursday, 9 January 2014
Wednesday, 8 January 2014
Tuesday, 10 December 2013
Ideas Behind Digipak And Magazine Advert.
The main idea behind the digipak and magazine advert is the theme of music and how people turn to it for comfort and relaxation. With theories showing most people feel more themselves listening to certain genres of music, such as people within my target audience would listen to heavier music, with relatable lyrics. I have also shown this throughout with an drawn image of a girl, listening to music, through headphones. This suggests that she's trying to 'ignore the world', which is shown through how the girl is treated in my music video.
Final Magazine Advert.
For my final idea for my magazine advert, I decided to use the same layout as my digipak, with the key information at the bottom of the page. The same colour scheme and title fonts are used throughout the advert, making the brand identity clear towards the digipak. I feel that my magazine advert would be placed in magazines such as Kerrang and RockSound, which most of my target audience would read (as they are alternative rock magazine.)
Final Magazine Advert - Editing Process.
When scanning the drawing, I erased the background of the drawing, leaving the white background from the layer underneath. Using the text tool, I created the title of the album and artist, (which created the front cover to my digipak).
Also, using the text tool, I created the website, date etc. using the same font styles as my album and artist name.
To create the logos for Play.com, iTunes, Virgin Records and the Kerrang ratings, I copyed and pasted them onto the image I was creating, using the scale tool, I got them to the right size needed.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




